Hey AI, Research The Evolution of Training Objectives in Deep Learning for Increasingly Complex Tasks (V2)

1. Introduction:
The field of deep learning has witnessed remarkable progress in its ability to tackle increasingly complex tasks, a development intricately linked with the evolution of training objectives. These objectives, which define what a deep learning model learns during its training phase, have become progressively sophisticated, enabling advancements from fundamental pattern recognition to intricate generative processes and decision-making in complex environments. This report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how different training objectives have allowed deep learning models to achieve these milestones, charting a course from the foundational principles that underpin core tasks to the more advanced objectives that drive cutting-edge research and applications. By examining the trajectory of these objectives, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms that have propelled deep learning to its current state of prominence across various domains. The structure of this report will follow a progression from the training objectives used in fundamental tasks like image classification and regression, to those employed in more advanced areas such as generative modeling, self-supervised learning, reinforcement learning, multi-task learning, and transfer learning, thereby illustrating the direct correlation between the sophistication of training objectives and the complexity of tasks that deep learning models can now effectively address.
2. The Foundation: Training Objectives for Core Tasks:

• 2.1 Image Classification:
  Early training objectives in image classification were primarily concerned with enabling models to accurately assign predefined labels to images by learning to identify and map relevant visual features to these categories 1. This fundamental task involves analyzing an image and predicting its class or category by extracting features that determine the most likely label from a set of classes 1. The aim is to create a model that can accurately recognize objects, scenes, or patterns within an image, a capability that has found critical real-world applications such as object recognition in self-driving cars, ensuring safer navigation for autonomous vehicles 1. Effective training of these models necessitated a specific data organization, involving distinct folders for training and test sets, with the training set containing labeled images to guide the learning process 1. Essential components for training included programming languages like Python, deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow and Keras, and libraries for data manipulation and image processing like NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, and OpenCV 1.
  The foundational training of image classification models relied on structured datasets and the iterative adjustment of model parameters using defined loss functions and optimization algorithms 1. The detailed requirements for data organization, such as maintaining separate training and test sets along with CSV files listing image names and their labels, indicate a systematic approach to training. Furthermore, the specification of core deep learning libraries like TensorFlow and Keras highlights the established infrastructure supporting this process. The mention of key training parameters, including epochs (the number of times the entire dataset is passed through the model), batch size (the number of samples processed before updating weights), learning rate (the step size for weight updates), loss function (the metric measuring prediction discrepancy), and optimizer (the algorithm updating weights), underscores the importance of the optimization process driven by the training objective 1.
  Early in the development of image classification, the adoption of data augmentation techniques demonstrated an understanding of the need to improve model generalization and robustness to variations in input data, directly influencing the training objective to achieve higher accuracy on unseen data 1. Techniques like random flips (horizontal and vertical), random rotations, zooms, crops, and adjustments to brightness, contrast, and saturation were employed to artificially increase the training dataset. By exposing the model to a wider range of image variations, these methods aimed to make the learned features more generalizable, enabling the model to perform accurately on images it had not encountered during training 1.
  The fundamental steps in training an image classification model include formulating the problem, identifying the inputs (images as pixels) and outputs (categories), preparing the data by normalizing pixel values and one-hot encoding labels, choosing or building a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, selecting a loss function and optimizer, and finally training the model over a number of epochs 2. The consistent workflow observed across different descriptions of image classification training suggests a well-established paradigm in the field 1. The training objective within this paradigm is to effectively learn the mapping from image pixels to the correct class labels through the chosen loss function and optimization methods. This involves iteratively refining the model’s weights to minimize the discrepancy between its predictions and the actual labels provided in the training data 2.
  Cross-entropy loss emerged as a common and fundamental loss function used in image classification to quantify the difference between the model’s predicted probability distribution for each class and the true distribution of the labels 1. The training objective, therefore, became to minimize this cross-entropy loss, which indicates that the model’s predictions are aligning more closely with the actual categories of the images 2. By mathematically quantifying the dissimilarity between these probability distributions, cross-entropy loss provided a specific and actionable objective for classification models. This objective guided the model’s learning process, enabling it to make more accurate categorical predictions by adjusting its parameters to reduce the loss 2.
  Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are particularly well-suited for image classification tasks due to their inherent ability to automatically learn hierarchical features from images through convolutional layers 3. The training process for these deep learning models is iterative, typically involving data collection, definition of the CNN architecture, selection of an appropriate loss function (such as cross-entropy), the choice of an optimization algorithm (like Adam or SGD), and a training loop where the model repeatedly processes batches of images, computes the loss, and updates its parameters to minimize this loss 3. The development and widespread adoption of CNNs were directly driven by the training objective of learning these hierarchical representations from image data, representations that could effectively discriminate between different visual categories 3. The architecture of CNNs, with its specialized layers for feature extraction (convolutional layers) and classification (fully connected layers), is inherently aligned with the task of image classification, and their training objectives were specifically tailored to learn the features most relevant for this task 3.
  In essence, the primary training objective for image classification models was to minimize the cross-entropy loss (or similar classification loss functions) using optimization algorithms like stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or its variants, such as Adam and RMSprop 1. Achieving this objective allowed the models to learn accurate mappings from input images to their corresponding categories, thereby enabling them to perform the complex task of image classification with increasing accuracy over time.
• 2.2 Regression Problems:
  Early training objectives in regression problems focused on enabling models to predict continuous numerical values by minimizing the error between the model’s predictions and the actual values 4. Regression, unlike classification which deals with discrete labels, involves predicting continuous outcomes in various fields, from finance (stock price prediction) to healthcare (predicting patient vitals) 4. The training process for deep learning regression models typically involves data preparation, model design (neural network architecture), selection of a loss function such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE) to quantify the prediction error, and optimization using algorithms like gradient descent to minimize this loss 4. The training objective was fundamentally to reduce the discrepancy between the model’s output and the true continuous values in the dataset.
  The choice between MSE and MAE as the loss function directly influenced the training objective in regression tasks 4. MSE, which calculates the average of the squared differences between predicted and actual values, penalizes larger errors more heavily. This encourages the model to reduce significant deviations from the true values. In contrast, MAE, which calculates the average of the absolute differences, treats all errors equally 4. Consequently, the training objective, when using MSE, emphasizes minimizing the impact of large errors, potentially leading to a model that is more sensitive to outliers. Conversely, when using MAE, the objective is to minimize the average magnitude of all errors, making the model less sensitive to extreme values 4.
  Traditional regression methods, such as linear regression and polynomial regression, also aimed to predict continuous values based on input features 5. Linear regression models the relationship between variables assuming a linear connection, while polynomial regression captures non-linear relationships by adding polynomial terms 5. The underlying training objective for these models was to find the parameters (e.g., the slope and intercept in simple linear regression, or the coefficients in polynomial regression) that define the best fit line or curve through the data points, thereby minimizing a chosen error metric. Although not always explicitly stated, this error metric often implicitly involves minimizing the sum of squared errors or a similar measure of the difference between the predicted and actual values 5.
  Gradient descent became a fundamental optimization algorithm for achieving the training objective in regression tasks, particularly with the advent of deep learning 4. In the context of linear regression, for example, the learning objectives include understanding the loss function (which quantifies the error of the model’s predictions) and how gradient descent iteratively adjusts the model’s parameters, such as weights and bias, to find the values that minimize this loss 6. The training objective is to navigate the parameter space defined by the model’s weights and bias, using the gradient of the loss function as a guide, to reach the minimum point where the model’s predictions are as close as possible to the actual values 6.
  Deep learning extended the capabilities of regression by allowing models, particularly neural networks with non-linear activation functions, to learn and model complex, non-linear relationships between input and output variables 4. While the architecture of these models became significantly more intricate than traditional regression techniques, the core training objective of minimizing prediction error remained consistent 7. Deep learning models for regression still rely on loss functions like MSE and MAE to quantify the difference between their predictions and the true continuous values. The training process involves using optimization algorithms, often more sophisticated variants of gradient descent like Adam or RMSprop, to adjust the numerous parameters of the deep network in a way that minimizes the chosen loss function, thus enabling the model to learn intricate patterns in the data and make accurate continuous value predictions 4.
  Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) served as fundamental loss functions for regression tasks in deep learning 4. These functions directly translated into the mathematical formulation of the training objective: to minimize the prediction errors made by the model when estimating continuous values. MSE calculates the average squared difference between the predicted and actual values, while MAE calculates the average absolute difference 4. These loss functions provided quantifiable targets for deep learning models in regression tasks, offering the necessary feedback for the model to adjust its weights and biases during training and ultimately achieve accurate continuous value predictions 4.

3. Unlocking Generation: Training Objectives for Generative Models:

• 3.1 Variational Autoencoders (VAEs):
  The training objective of Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) is to learn a probabilistic model of the data distribution, enabling the model to both encode input data into a lower-dimensional latent space and generate new data points that resemble the training data by sampling from this learned latent space 8. This is achieved by maximizing a lower bound on the log-likelihood of the data, known as the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) 8.
  The Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) objective in VAEs represents a carefully balanced trade-off between two key goals: generating accurate reconstructions of the input data and learning a well-structured, continuous latent space that is suitable for sampling novel, meaningful data points 8. The ELBO is composed of two distinct terms. The first term, the reconstruction loss, measures the discrepancy between the input data and its reconstruction generated by the decoder network. Minimizing this loss ensures that the VAE can effectively compress and decompress the data, retaining essential information. The second term is the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization term, which encourages the learned distribution of the latent space to be close to a predefined prior distribution, typically a standard normal distribution. This regularization ensures that the latent space is continuous and well-organized, allowing for smooth transitions between different data points and facilitating the generation of new, plausible samples by randomly sampling from this space 8.
  Minimizing the reconstruction error is a critical aspect of the VAE’s training objective, as it ensures that the decoder network learns to map points from the latent space back to the original data space in a way that produces outputs similar to the training data 9. Simultaneously, the KL divergence regularization term plays a crucial role in encouraging the encoder network to learn a latent space that adheres to a predefined prior distribution, such as a Gaussian distribution 8. This constraint on the latent space is essential for the VAE’s generative capabilities. By ensuring that the latent space is continuous and doesn’t have large gaps or discontinuities, it allows for meaningful interpolation between encoded data points and the generation of entirely new, yet plausible, samples by randomly sampling from the prior distribution and passing these samples through the decoder 9.
  Variational inference is the primary technique employed to train VAEs, as it provides a method for approximating the complex and often intractable posterior distribution of the latent variables given the observed data 8. The training objective in this context is framed as maximizing the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO), which serves as a computationally tractable lower bound on the true log-likelihood of the data 10. A key challenge in training VAEs is dealing with the intractability of the posterior distribution, and variational inference addresses this by introducing an approximate posterior distribution parameterized by a neural network (the encoder). To enable the use of gradient-based optimization techniques, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or Adam, the reparameterization trick is often employed. This technique allows for backpropagation through the sampling process in the latent space, making end-to-end training of the VAE feasible 8.
  The Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) and its constituent parts, the reconstruction loss and the KL divergence regularization term, along with its precise mathematical formulation, form the central training objective for VAEs 8. The mathematical expression for the ELBO is given by (ELBO = \mathbb{E}_{q(z|x)}[\log p(x|z)] - KL[q(z|x) |
  | p(z)]), where (q(z|x)) is the approximate posterior distribution learned by the encoder, (p(x|z)) is the likelihood of the data given the latent variables modeled by the decoder, and (p(z)) is the prior distribution over the latent variables 8. The KL divergence term, (KL[q(z|x) |
  | p(z)]), specifically encourages the learned latent space distribution to match the prior distribution, typically a standard normal distribution, ensuring that the latent space has desirable properties for generation 8. This mathematical rigor underpins the ability of VAEs to learn and generate data in a principled way, balancing the fidelity of reconstruction with the coherence of the latent space.
• 3.2 Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs):
  The training objective of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) is to simultaneously train two neural networks: a generator and a discriminator, in an adversarial manner 13. The generator network aims to learn the underlying distribution of the training data and produce synthetic data samples that are indistinguishable from real data. The discriminator network, on the other hand, acts as a binary classifier, learning to distinguish between real data samples from the training set and fake data samples produced by the generator 13.
  The adversarial nature of the training objective in GANs is what drives the continuous improvement of both the generator and the discriminator 13. The generator’s training objective is to maximize the probability that the discriminator will classify its generated data as real. Essentially, the generator tries to create data that is so realistic that it can “fool” the discriminator into believing it is authentic 13. Conversely, the discriminator’s training objective is to correctly classify both real data samples (as real) and generated data samples (as fake). This creates a competitive scenario, often described as a zero-sum game, where the generator is trying to maximize its score by fooling the discriminator, and the discriminator is trying to minimize the generator’s score by correctly identifying the fakes 14. The ultimate goal of this adversarial training process is to reach a point of Nash Equilibrium, where the generator is producing data that the discriminator can no longer reliably distinguish from real data, and neither network can improve its performance further 14.
  The training objective in GANs can also be understood in terms of loss functions 14. The generator model is trained by optimizing a loss function that measures the difference between the generated data and the training data. The goal for the generator is to minimize this loss, which ideally occurs when the generated data is highly similar to the real data, thus fooling the discriminator 14. The discriminator model, on the other hand, is trained by optimizing a loss function that measures the difference between the generated data and the real data. The discriminator aims to maximize this loss, which means it becomes better at distinguishing between authentic and synthetic samples 14. This interplay of minimizing the generator’s loss and maximizing the discriminator’s loss is the core of the adversarial training process in GANs.
  The mathematical formulation of the adversarial loss in GANs, often referred to as the Min-Max Loss, provides a precise objective function that guides the training of both the generator and the discriminator 15. The original GAN loss function can be expressed as ( \min_G \max_D V(D, G) = \mathbb{E}{x \sim p{data}(x)}[\log D(x)] + \mathbb{E}_{z \sim p_z(z)}[\log(1 - D(G(z)))] ), where (D(x)) is the discriminator’s probability of classifying a real data sample (x) as real, and (D(G(z))) is the discriminator’s probability of classifying a generated sample (G(z)) (from random noise (z)) as real 15. The generator (G) aims to minimize this value (or equivalently, maximize the probability that (D(G(z))) is close to 1), while the discriminator (D) aims to maximize it (correctly classifying real data as 1 and fake data as 0) 15. Over time, various modifications to this original loss function have been proposed to address issues like training instability and mode collapse, leading to advancements such as Non-Saturating GAN Loss, Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), and Conditional GANs (CGANs), each with its own specific mathematical formulation of the adversarial training objective 21.

4. Learning Without Labels: Training Objectives in Self-Supervised Learning:

• 4.1 Natural Language Processing (NLP):
  In the realm of Natural Language Processing (NLP), self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training deep learning models on vast amounts of unlabeled text data 22. The core idea is to design pretext tasks that leverage the inherent structure and statistical regularities of language to generate supervisory signals from the data itself, without requiring explicit human annotations 22. The training objectives in SSL for NLP are diverse and aim to capture different aspects of language understanding.
  One prominent training objective in SSL for NLP is masked language modeling (MLM), exemplified by models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) 25. In this task, a certain percentage of words in a text sequence are randomly masked, and the model is trained to predict the original masked words based on the context provided by the unmasked words in the sentence 22. This objective forces the model to learn deep contextual embeddings of words and understand the semantic relationships between them 26. Another fundamental training objective is next sentence prediction (NSP), where the model is trained to predict whether a given sentence follows another sentence in a text corpus 25. This helps the model understand the relationships and coherence between different segments of text 25. Auto-regressive language modeling is yet another key SSL objective, where the model is trained to predict the next word in a sequence given the preceding words 25. This approach, used in models like GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), enables the model to learn the sequential nature of language and generate coherent text 22. These diverse training objectives in SSL for NLP allow models to learn rich and general-purpose language representations from unlabeled data, which can then be effectively fine-tuned for a wide range of downstream NLP tasks, such as text classification, sentiment analysis, and question answering 22.
  Language modeling stands as a central self-supervised training objective in NLP, with the goal of training models to understand and generate human language 22. These models learn to predict the probability of a sequence of words occurring in a given context. For instance, the objective might be to predict the next word in a sentence based on the preceding words 22. Masked language modeling is a specific and highly effective instance of this objective, where the model is tasked with predicting randomly masked words within a sentence 26. By training on vast amounts of unlabeled text data using these objectives, language models learn the underlying structure, grammar, and semantics of the language 22. This pre-training phase allows the models to develop a strong understanding of language, which can then be transferred and fine-tuned for specific downstream tasks, demonstrating the power of learning general language representations through self-supervision 22.
• 4.2 Computer Vision:
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) has also made significant strides in the field of computer vision, aiming to learn useful visual representations from the abundance of unlabeled images and videos available 23. Similar to its application in NLP, SSL in computer vision relies on designing pretext tasks that create supervisory signals from the unlabeled visual data itself 29. These training objectives enable models to learn about the visual world without the need for costly and time-consuming manual labeling.
  One prominent self-supervised learning technique in computer vision is contrastive learning 25. A key objective in contrastive learning is to train a model to recognize that different augmentations or views of the same image should be considered similar, while views of different images should be dissimilar 29. For example, a model might be shown two differently cropped and colored versions of the same dog image and trained to produce similar representations (embeddings) for both, while producing dissimilar representations for an image of a cat 29. This objective encourages the model to learn features that are invariant to certain transformations, leading to robust representations that can be used for downstream tasks like image classification and object detection 29. Another important self-supervised training objective in computer vision is image colorization, where a model is trained to predict the color channels of a grayscale image 25. This task requires the model to understand the semantic content of the image to infer the likely colors of different objects and regions. Predicting missing parts of an image is another effective SSL objective, where the model is trained to fill in occluded or missing regions of an image based on the surrounding context 23. This forces the model to learn about the spatial relationships and visual coherence within images. Autoencoders, which are trained to reconstruct their input, also serve as a self-supervised learning technique in computer vision 23. The objective here is to minimize the reconstruction error, which compels the model to learn a compressed and meaningful representation of the input image in its latent space 23. These various training objectives in SSL for computer vision enable models to learn rich visual features from unlabeled data, making them highly effective for a wide range of downstream computer vision tasks, especially in scenarios where labeled data is scarce 23.
  In computer vision, contrastive learning aims to train a model to recognize the same image under different transformations 29. The objective is to maximize the agreement in the learned representation between different augmented views of the same image, while minimizing the agreement between representations of different images 29. This allows the model to learn features that are invariant to these transformations, such as changes in viewpoint, lighting, or color, leading to more robust and generalizable visual representations 29. Autoencoders, on the other hand, have the objective of reconstructing the original input image from a compressed representation 23. The model is trained to minimize the reconstruction error, forcing it to learn the most salient features of the input data that are necessary for accurate reconstruction 23. This process enables the model to learn useful representations of the visual data in an unsupervised manner 23.

5. Learning Through Interaction: Training Objectives in Reinforcement Learning:

The fundamental training objective in reinforcement learning (RL) is for an intelligent agent to learn an optimal policy—a strategy that dictates the agent’s actions in any given state—by interacting with a dynamic environment 32. The ultimate goal of the agent is to maximize the expected cumulative reward it receives over time as a consequence of its actions 32.

The reward function is a critical component of the reinforcement learning framework, as it provides the primary training signal to the agent 32. This function assigns a numerical value, or reward, to each action taken by the agent in a particular state 33. Positive rewards are given to encourage desirable actions that bring the agent closer to its goal, while negative rewards or penalties discourage undesirable actions 33. The agent learns to associate certain states and actions with higher rewards and adjusts its policy over time to favor those actions, thereby striving to maximize the total reward accumulated throughout its interactions with the environment 32. The design of an effective reward function is therefore crucial, as it directly influences the agent’s learning process and the behavior it ultimately adopts 33.

Value functions, such as the Q-function and the V-function, also serve as important training objectives in reinforcement learning 37. The V-function, or state-value function, estimates the expected cumulative reward that an agent can achieve starting from a particular state and following a specific policy thereafter 32. It essentially tells the agent how “good” it is to be in a given state 32. The Q-function, or state-action value function, extends this concept by estimating the expected cumulative reward of taking a specific action in a particular state and then following a policy 38. By learning these value functions, the agent gains the ability to evaluate the long-term consequences of its actions and make informed decisions that maximize its future rewards 32. Algorithms like Q-learning and SARSA directly aim to learn these value functions as a means to derive an optimal policy 38.

Policy gradient methods offer an alternative approach to reinforcement learning where the training objective is to directly optimize the agent’s policy without explicitly learning a value function 43. A policy is typically parameterized by a set of weights, and the goal is to find the optimal set of weights that maximizes the expected discounted return (cumulative reward) obtained by following the policy 43. This is often achieved using gradient ascent, where the policy parameters are iteratively updated in the direction that increases the expected reward 43. Policy gradient methods are particularly well-suited for environments with continuous action spaces or when the policy itself is easier to represent and optimize than a value function 43. Algorithms like REINFORCE and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) fall under this category 43.

The overarching training objective in reinforcement learning is indeed to maximize the cumulative reward that the agent receives from its interactions with the environment 48. This objective fundamentally distinguishes reinforcement learning from supervised learning, where the aim is to learn a mapping from inputs to outputs based on labeled data 48. In RL, the agent learns through trial and error, receiving evaluative feedback in the form of rewards, and adjusts its behavior to achieve the highest possible long-term reward 34. This focus on reward maximization drives the development of policies that enable agents to solve complex tasks in a wide variety of dynamic and uncertain environments 34.

6. Leveraging Multiple Tasks and Prior Knowledge:

• 6.1 Multi-Task Learning:
  In multi-task learning (MTL), the primary training objective is to enable a single deep learning model to learn and perform well across multiple related tasks simultaneously 54. Instead of training separate models for each task, MTL aims to leverage the commonalities and differences between tasks to improve the learning efficiency and generalization ability of the model on all the tasks involved 55. This is typically achieved by optimizing a combined loss function that aggregates the loss computed for each individual task 54.
  The training objective in multi-task learning often involves finding a delicate balance between the potentially conflicting objectives of different tasks 54. For instance, one task might require the model to learn certain features that are detrimental to the performance on another task. To address this, a common approach is to optimize a weighted linear combination of the loss functions associated with each task 54. The weights assigned to each task’s loss can be crucial in determining the model’s final performance across all tasks, often requiring careful tuning 56. Another perspective frames MTL as a multi-objective optimization problem, where the goal is to find a set of model parameters that represent a Pareto optimal solution, meaning that no other set of parameters can improve the performance on one task without degrading the performance on at least one other task 54. Techniques such as hard parameter sharing (where hidden layers are shared across tasks) and soft parameter sharing (where each task has its own parameters but they are encouraged to be similar through regularization) are commonly employed to facilitate the transfer of knowledge and inductive biases between related tasks 56. Multi-task learning has proven beneficial in a wide array of applications, including natural language processing (e.g., joint learning of speech tagging and sentiment analysis), computer vision (e.g., simultaneous object detection, segmentation, and classification), and healthcare (e.g., multi-disease diagnosis from medical images) 55.
  In multi-task learning, the training objective is to optimize a combination of multiple task-specific objectives within a single model. This reflects the fundamental goal of achieving good performance on all the tasks that the model is being trained to perform. By learning these tasks jointly, the model can often discover shared representations and leverage knowledge gained from one task to improve its performance on others 55. This synergistic learning process is a key advantage of multi-task learning, leading to more data-efficient and potentially more accurate models compared to training each task in isolation 56.
• 6.2 Transfer Learning:
  The training objective in transfer learning is to leverage the knowledge acquired by a deep learning model from training on a source task, often with a large dataset, and apply this knowledge to a different but related target task, which may have significantly less data 63. This process typically involves two main phases: pre-training and fine-tuning 68.
  During the pre-training phase, a model is trained on a large and often diverse dataset associated with the source task. The training objectives in this phase are usually standard objectives for tasks like image recognition (e.g., minimizing cross-entropy loss on a dataset like ImageNet) or language modeling (e.g., masked language modeling on a large text corpus) 64. The goal is for the model to learn generalizable features and representations from this extensive data 63. In the subsequent fine-tuning phase, the pre-trained model is adapted to the specific target task using a smaller, task-specific dataset 68. The training objective here is to optimize the model’s performance on the new task by further training it on the target dataset. This often involves adjusting the weights of some or all of the model’s layers, typically using a smaller learning rate than in the pre-training phase to avoid drastically altering the knowledge already learned 65. Different strategies for fine-tuning exist, such as feature extraction (where only the top layers of the pre-trained model are trained) and full fine-tuning (where all or most of the layers are updated) 65. Transfer learning has become a cornerstone of modern deep learning, enabling the development of high-performing models even with limited task-specific data by capitalizing on the rich representations learned from related, larger datasets 66.
  The training objective in transfer learning is a two-stage process. First, the objective during pre-training is to learn a broad set of generalizable features by training on a large source dataset 63. This initial training equips the model with a strong foundation of knowledge relevant to a range of related tasks 63. Second, the objective during fine-tuning is to adapt these pre-learned features to a specific target task by training the model further on a typically smaller dataset that is specific to the target task 65. The success of transfer learning hinges on the degree of similarity between the source and target tasks, as this determines how effectively the learned features can be transferred and adapted 65.

7. The Role of Loss Functions in Driving Complexity:

The design and evolution of loss functions have played a pivotal role in enabling deep learning models to tackle increasingly complex tasks across various domains 78. A loss function serves as a mathematical measure of how well a model’s predictions align with the true outcomes, providing a quantitative metric that guides the model’s training process by indicating the error to be minimized 78. The choice and design of the loss function directly influence the learning dynamics of the model, including the speed of convergence and the types of errors that are penalized more heavily 78.

For fundamental tasks like regression, early loss functions such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) provided effective ways to quantify the error between predicted continuous values and actual values 78. MSE penalizes larger errors quadratically, making it sensitive to outliers, while MAE penalizes errors linearly, making it more robust to outliers 80. As tasks became more nuanced, variations like Huber loss and Log-Cosh loss were developed to combine the benefits of both MSE and MAE, offering robustness to outliers while still penalizing large errors significantly 78.

In classification tasks, the cross-entropy loss (including binary and categorical versions) became the standard for measuring the difference between the predicted probability distribution over classes and the true distribution 78. Its ability to penalize incorrect predictions based on their probability made it highly effective for learning to discriminate between different categories 78. For more complex classification scenarios, such as those with imbalanced datasets or a need to focus on hard-to-classify examples, loss functions like Focal Loss were introduced to modulate the impact of easy and hard examples during training 78.

The advent of generative models like VAEs and GANs necessitated the design of specialized loss functions. VAEs rely on the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO), which combines a reconstruction loss (e.g., MSE or binary cross-entropy, depending on the data type) with a KL divergence term that encourages the learned latent space to adhere to a prior distribution 8. GANs employ adversarial loss, where the discriminator’s ability to distinguish between real and generated data guides the generator’s learning process 13. The development of various forms of adversarial loss, such as the Non-Saturating loss and Wasserstein loss, reflects the ongoing effort to improve the stability and quality of GAN training 21.

For tasks like object detection and segmentation, specialized loss functions like Smooth L1 loss, IoU loss, Dice loss, and Tversky loss were developed to directly address the specific requirements of these tasks, such as localizing objects with bounding boxes and segmenting images into meaningful regions 78. Similarly, for tasks involving sequences (e.g., speech recognition), loss functions like Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss were designed to handle the alignment between input sequences and output labels 78.

The ability to design custom, task-specific loss functions in deep learning frameworks provides immense flexibility in tailoring the training objective to the specific nuances of a problem 87. This has been instrumental in pushing the boundaries of what deep learning models can achieve in highly specialized and complex domains. The table below illustrates the task-specific nature of loss function selection across various deep learning applications 87:

The development and refinement of these diverse and specialized loss functions underscore their critical role in driving the increasing complexity and capability of deep learning models across a wide spectrum of tasks.

8. Recent Advancements and Future Directions:

• 8.1 Contrastive Learning:
  Recent progress in contrastive learning has significantly advanced the field of self-supervised representation learning 31. The fundamental training objective in contrastive learning is to learn embeddings of data points such that similar points are located close to each other in the embedding space, while dissimilar points are pushed far apart 31. This is typically achieved by creating positive pairs, which are different augmented views of the same data instance, and negative pairs, which are augmented views of different instances 31. Models are then trained to maximize the similarity between positive pairs and minimize the similarity between negative pairs using various contrastive loss functions 31. Recent advancements, such as SIMSKIP, focus on refining input embeddings for downstream tasks by leveraging outputs from previously trained encoders 92. CLEFT, another recent method, introduces an efficient language-image contrastive learning approach with large language models and prompt fine-tuning, achieving state-of-the-art performance in medical imaging 94. These advancements highlight the potential of contrastive learning to learn powerful data representations from unlabeled data, leading to improved performance in a variety of complex tasks, especially in scenarios where labeled data is scarce 31.
• 8.2 Adversarial Training:
  Adversarial training has emerged as a crucial technique to enhance the robustness of deep learning models against adversarial attacks, which are carefully crafted inputs designed to fool the model 95. The core training objective involves training the model not only on clean, original data but also on adversarial examples generated to maximize the model’s prediction error 95. This is often formulated as a min-max optimization problem where the model tries to minimize the loss on adversarial examples generated by an adversary that tries to maximize this loss 97. Recent advancements in adversarial training aim to address challenges such as the computational cost of generating adversarial examples and the trade-off between robustness and accuracy on clean data 95. Methods like embedding dynamic adversarial perturbations into the parameter space and multi-stage optimization-based adversarial training (MOAT) have been proposed to improve efficiency and avoid overfitting 95. Notably, research is exploring ways to break the inherent trade-off between accuracy and robustness, as seen in the DUCAT framework which utilizes dummy classes to achieve concurrent improvements in both aspects 98. These ongoing advancements are crucial for deploying deep learning models in security-sensitive real-world applications.
• 8.3 Meta-Learning:
  Meta-learning, also known as “learning to learn,” represents a paradigm shift in training objectives, aiming to develop models that can quickly adapt to new tasks and generalize effectively with limited data by learning from a distribution of related tasks 100. The training objective in meta-learning involves learning a meta-learner that can acquire transferable knowledge or a learning strategy from a set of meta-training tasks 100. This learned meta-knowledge then enables the model to rapidly learn and perform well on new, unseen tasks with only a few examples, a concept often referred to as few-shot learning 100. Recent advancements in meta-learning are exploring its application to domain generalization, where the goal is to train models that can perform well on new, unseen domains without requiring access to target domain data during training 102. Frameworks like GRAM (Gradient-RegulAted Meta-prompt learning) aim to meta-learn efficient prompt initializations and gradient regulating functions to enhance cross-domain generalizability of vision-language models 103. The development of meta-learning techniques holds significant promise for creating more adaptable and data-efficient AI systems capable of tackling complex tasks in dynamic and data-scarce environments 101.

9. Conclusion:

The journey of deep learning has been marked by a continuous evolution in the objectives that guide the training of its models. From the initial focus on minimizing misclassification in image recognition and prediction error in regression, the field has expanded to encompass sophisticated objectives for generating realistic data, learning from unlabeled sources, making decisions through interaction, and leveraging knowledge across multiple tasks and domains. The development of specialized loss functions tailored to specific tasks has been instrumental in this progress, allowing for fine-grained control over the learning process and enabling models to achieve remarkable feats in complex domains. Recent advancements in areas like contrastive learning, adversarial training, and meta-learning signal an ongoing drive towards even more powerful and adaptable deep learning systems. As training objectives continue to evolve, we can anticipate further breakthroughs that will push the boundaries of what deep learning models can achieve, promising a future where AI can tackle increasingly intricate and nuanced challenges.

Works cited

1. How to Train an Image Classification Model | Keylabs, accessed March 13, 2025, https://keylabs.ai/blog/how-to-train-an-image-classification-model/
2. Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks …, accessed March 13, 2025, https://carpentries-incubator.github.io/intro-image-classification-cnn/01-introduction.html
3. Deep Learning Models for Classification : A Comprehensive Guide - Metana, accessed March 13, 2025, https://metana.io/blog/deep-learning-models-for-classification-a-comprehensive-guide/
4. Regression In Deep Learning Solving Complex Problems, accessed March 13, 2025, https://blog.arunangshudas.com/regression-in-deep-learning-solving-problem/
5. Regression in machine learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/regression-in-machine-learning/
6. Linear regression | Machine Learning | Google for Developers, accessed March 13, 2025, https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/crash-course/linear-regression
7. Fundamental Tasks of AI — Part 1 — Classification and Regression | by Sasirekha Cota, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@sasirekharameshkumar/deep-learning-basics-part-7-using-ai-for-classification-and-regression-a0c1a97ca918
8. Generative Models — Variational Autoencoders | by Ritik Pandey …, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@ritik2388/generative-models-variational-autoencoders-994745c57c32
9. What is a Variational Autoencoder? - IBM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/variational-autoencoder
10. How does variational inference facilitate the training of intractable models, and what are the main challenges associated with it? - EITCA Academy, accessed March 13, 2025, https://eitca.org/artificial-intelligence/eitc-ai-adl-advanced-deep-learning/advanced-generative-models/modern-latent-variable-models/examination-review-modern-latent-variable-models/how-does-variational-inference-facilitate-the-training-of-intractable-models-and-what-are-the-main-challenges-associated-with-it/
11. Variational Inference and Generative Models - CS 330, accessed March 13, 2025, https://cs330.stanford.edu/fall2022/lecture_slides/cs330_variational_inference_2022.pdf
12. Variational Inference and Generative Models - Berkeley RAIL Lab, accessed March 13, 2025, https://rail.eecs.berkeley.edu/deeprlcourse-fa18/static/slides/lec-14.pdf
13. Train Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) - MathWorks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ug/train-generative-adversarial-network.html
14. Guide to Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in 2024 - viso.ai, accessed March 13, 2025, https://viso.ai/deep-learning/generative-adversarial-networks-gan/
15. Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/generative-adversarial-network-gan/
16. Introduction | Machine Learning | Google for Developers, accessed March 13, 2025, https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/gan
17. What is a GAN? - Generative Adversarial Networks Explained - AWS, accessed March 13, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/gan/
18. Understanding Loss Functions in GANs: GAN Training and Impact on Results - Medium, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@mahzaibkhalid235/understanding-loss-functions-in-gans-gan-training-and-impact-on-results-ae96418f2e94
19. The Math Behind GANs - Jake Tae, accessed March 13, 2025, https://jaketae.github.io/study/gan-math/
20. Math behind GAN (generative adversarial networks) & its applications - Labellerr, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.labellerr.com/blog/math-behind-gan-its-applications/
21. Understanding GAN Loss Functions - Neptune.ai, accessed March 13, 2025, https://neptune.ai/blog/gan-loss-functions
22. Introduction to self-supervised learning in NLP - Turing, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.turing.com/kb/introduction-to-self-supervised-learning-in-nlp
23. What Is Self-Supervised Learning? | IBM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/self-supervised-learning
24. Self-supervised learning - Wikipedia, accessed March 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-supervised_learning
25. Self-Supervised Learning and Its Applications - Neptune.ai, accessed March 13, 2025, https://neptune.ai/blog/self-supervised-learning
26. Self-Supervised Learning Guide: Super simple way to understand AI …, accessed March 13, 2025, https://nathanrosidi.medium.com/self-supervised-learning-guide-super-simple-way-to-understand-ai-f7a47f1a7b7a
27. Step-by-Step Illustrated Explanations of Transformer | by Yule Wang, PhD | The Modern Scientist | Medium, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/the-modern-scientist/detailed-explanations-of-transformer-step-by-step-dc32d90b3a98
28. Self-Supervised Learning in Computer Vision: Image Classification, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/data-science/network/computer-vision-image-classification
29. Self-Supervised Learning: Everything You Need to Know (2024 …, accessed March 13, 2025, https://viso.ai/deep-learning/self-supervised-learning-for-computer-vision/
30. Essential Insights into Self-Supervised Learning for Computer Vision - XenonStack, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.xenonstack.com/blog/self-supervised-learning-computer-vision
31. Contrastive Learning in Computer Vision: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions, accessed March 13, 2025, https://pareto.ai/blog/contrastive-learning-in-computer-vision
32. Reinforcement learning - Wikipedia, accessed March 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement_learning
33. How to Make a Reward Function in Reinforcement Learning? - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/how-to-make-a-reward-function-in-reinforcement-learning/
34. Reinforcement Learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-reinforcement-learning/
35. Reward Function in Reinforcement Learning | by Amit Yadav | Biased-Algorithms | Medium, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/biased-algorithms/reward-function-in-reinforcement-learning-c9ee04cabe7d
36. AI Explainer: What Are Reinforcement Learning ‘Rewards’? - Zenoss, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.zenoss.com/blog/ai-explainer-what-are-reinforcement-learning-rewards
37. datascience.stackexchange.com, accessed March 13, 2025, https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/9832/what-is-the-q-function-and-what-is-the-v-function-in-reinforcement-learning#:~:text=The%20Q%20function%20takes%20both,used%20to%20evaluate%20different%20policies.
38. What is the Q function and what is the V function in reinforcement learning?, accessed March 13, 2025, https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/9832/what-is-the-q-function-and-what-is-the-v-function-in-reinforcement-learning
39. Value function and Q-value - Data Science Stack Exchange, accessed March 13, 2025, https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/60606/value-function-and-q-value
40. CSC 411 Lecture 21-22: Reinforcement learning, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jlucas/teaching/csc411/lectures/lec21_22_handout.pdf
41. Confuse with Bellman Value Function and Bellman Q function : r/reinforcementlearning - Reddit, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/reinforcementlearning/comments/pmqssc/confuse_with_bellman_value_function_and_bellman_q/
42. How does Q and value function differ? : r/reinforcementlearning - Reddit, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/reinforcementlearning/comments/1csdwxu/how_does_q_and_value_function_differ/
43. Policy Gradient Methods in Reinforcement Learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/policy-gradient-methods-in-reinforcement-learning/
44. Explaining Policy Gradient methods in Reinforcement learning Part 1 - Bechir Trabelsi, accessed March 13, 2025, https://bechirtr97.medium.com/explaining-policy-gradient-methods-in-reinforcement-learning-part-1-reinforce-algorithm-1f5f10928ce0
45. Policy Gradient Algorithms - Lil’Log, accessed March 13, 2025, https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2018-04-08-policy-gradient/
46. Diving deeper into policy-gradient methods - Hugging Face Deep RL Course, accessed March 13, 2025, https://huggingface.co/learn/deep-rl-course/unit4/policy-gradient
47. Policy Gradient Theorem Explained: A Hands-On Introduction | DataCamp, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/policy-gradient-theorem
48. accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/deep-learning-tutorial/reinforcement-learning-in-deep-learning
49. Reinforcement Learning or Supervised Learning? - Stack Overflow, accessed March 13, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53291055/reinforcement-learning-or-supervised-learning
50. Supervised vs Unsupervised vs Reinforcement - AITUDE, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.aitude.com/supervised-vs-unsupervised-vs-reinforcement/
51. Supervised vs Unsupervised vs Reinforcement Learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/supervised-vs-reinforcement-vs-unsupervised/
52. ELI5: Machine Learning: Relationship and differences between supervised learning, reinforcement learning and unsupervised learning. : r/explainlikeimfive - Reddit, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/7gmxmy/eli5_machine_learning_relationship_and/
53. Supervised vs. Unsupervised vs. Reinforcement Learning: What’s the Difference? | phData, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.phdata.io/blog/difference-between-supervised-unsupervised-reinforcement-learning/
54. Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization - NIPS papers, accessed March 13, 2025, https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7334-multi-task-learning-as-multi-objective-optimization
55. Multi-task learning - Wikipedia, accessed March 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-task_learning
56. Multi-Task Learning in ML: Optimization & Use Cases [Overview] - V7 Labs, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.v7labs.com/blog/multi-task-learning-guide
57. overview of multi-task learning | National Science Review - Oxford Academic, accessed March 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/5/1/30/4101432
58. An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networks - ruder.io, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ruder.io/multi-task/
59. Multi-task Learning in Machine Learning | Infosys BPM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.infosysbpm.com/glossary/multi-task-learning.html
60. Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization - NIPS papers, accessed March 13, 2025, http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/7334-multi-task-learning-as-multi-objective-optimization.pdf
61. Multi-Task Learning Made Simple & Popular Approaches Explained - Spot Intelligence, accessed March 13, 2025, https://spotintelligence.com/2024/10/07/multi-task-learning-made-simple-popular-approaches-explained/
62. Multi-Task Learning: Enhancing Model Efficiency and Generalization | by Zhong Hong, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@zhonghong9998/multi-task-learning-enhancing-model-efficiency-and-generalization-4d6f5ffd2fa7
63. Transfer Learning: Harnessing the Power of Pre-Trained Models for Business Success, accessed March 13, 2025, https://toloka.ai/blog/transfer-learning/
64. Transfer Learning Using Pre-trained Models in Deep Learning - Analytics Vidhya, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2017/06/transfer-learning-the-art-of-fine-tuning-a-pre-trained-model/
65. Guide To Transfer Learning in Deep Learning | by David Fagbuyiro - Medium, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@davidfagb/guide-to-transfer-learning-in-deep-learning-1f685db1fc94
66. What Is Transfer Learning? A Guide for Deep Learning | Built In, accessed March 13, 2025, https://builtin.com/data-science/transfer-learning
67. What is Transfer Learning? | Iguazio, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.iguazio.com/glossary/transfer-learning/
68. What is Transfer Learning? - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ml-introduction-to-transfer-learning/
69. Learning about Deep Learning: Transfer Learning & Reinforcement Learning, part 2 - Functionize, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.functionize.com/blog/transfer-learning-and-reinforcement-learning
70. What do you mean by pretraining, finetuning and transfer learning? - AIML.com, accessed March 13, 2025, https://aiml.com/what-do-you-mean-by-pretraining-finetuning-and-transfer-learning-in-the-context-of-machine-learning-or-language-modeling/
71. What is Fine-Tuning? | IBM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/fine-tuning
72. Pre-training via Transfer Learning and Pretext Learning a Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Assessments of Clinical PET Image Quality, accessed March 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7614424/
73. How to fine-tune a pre-trained model for Generative AI applications? - LeewayHertz, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.leewayhertz.com/fine-tuning-pre-trained-models/
74. AI model fine-tuning concepts | Microsoft Learn, accessed March 13, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ai/fine-tuning
75. Transfer Learning Strategies to Know for Images as Data - Fiveable, accessed March 13, 2025, https://fiveable.me/lists/transfer-learning-strategies
76. Guide to Transfer Learning - Encord, accessed March 13, 2025, https://encord.com/blog/transfer-learning/
77. Transfer learning and few-shot learning: Improving generalization across diverse tasks and domains | by Abis Hussain Syed, accessed March 13, 2025, https://syedabis98.medium.com/transfer-learning-and-few-shot-learning-improving-generalization-across-diverse-tasks-and-domains-a743781ee357
78. Loss Functions in Deep Learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/loss-functions-in-deep-learning/
79. Introduction to Loss Functions | DataRobot Blog, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.datarobot.com/blog/introduction-to-loss-functions/
80. Loss Functions in Machine Learning Explained - DataCamp, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/loss-function-in-machine-learning
81. Understanding the Importance of Loss Functions in Deep Learning - Stackademic, accessed March 13, 2025, https://blog.stackademic.com/understanding-the-importance-of-loss-functions-in-deep-learning-dd5ff33551d5
82. Understanding Loss Function in Deep Learning - Analytics Vidhya, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2022/06/understanding-loss-function-in-deep-learning/
83. What is Loss Function? | IBM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/loss-function
84. A Comprehensive Guide to the 7 Key Loss Functions in Deep Learning - Dataaspirant, accessed March 13, 2025, https://dataaspirant.com/loss-functions-in-deep-learning/
85. Loss Functions in Neural Networks & Deep Learning | Built In, accessed March 13, 2025, https://builtin.com/machine-learning/loss-functions
86. Loss functions in Deep Learning - Medium, accessed March 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@ibtedaazeem/loss-functions-in-deep-learning-e4bd353ea08a
87. Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learning - arXiv, accessed March 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2307.02694v3
88. The heart of machine learning: Understanding the importance of loss functions - EyeOn, accessed March 13, 2025, https://eyeonplanning.com/blog/the-heart-of-machine-learning-understanding-the-importance-of-loss-functions/
89. PyTorch Loss Functions: The Ultimate Guide - Neptune.ai, accessed March 13, 2025, https://neptune.ai/blog/pytorch-loss-functions
90. Designing task-specific loss functions - Keras Deep Learning: Build Neural Networks in Python | StudyRaid, accessed March 13, 2025, https://app.studyraid.com/en/read/14387/490264/designing-task-specific-loss-functions
91. Surrogate- and invariance-boosted contrastive learning for data-scarce applications in science - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed March 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9304370/
92. [2404.08701] Can Contrastive Learning Refine Embeddings - arXiv, accessed March 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08701
93. New contrastive-learning methods for better data representation - Amazon Science, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.amazon.science/blog/new-contrastive-learning-methods-for-better-data-representation
94. [2407.21011] CLEFT: Language-Image Contrastive Learning with Efficient Large Language Model and Prompt Fine-Tuning - arXiv, accessed March 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21011
95. What is Adversarial Training - Activeloop, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.activeloop.ai/resources/glossary/adversarial-training/
96. Latest Trends In Adversarial Networks | Restackio, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.restack.io/p/adversarial-networks-answer-latest-trends-in-gans-cat-ai
97. Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustness | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353831195_Recent_Advances_in_Adversarial_Training_for_Adversarial_Robustness
98. New Paradigm of Adversarial Training: Breaking Inherent Trade-Off between Accuracy and Robustness via Dummy Classes - arXiv, accessed March 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.12671v1
99. Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustness - IJCAI, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2021/0591.pdf
100. What Is Meta Learning? - IBM, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/meta-learning
101. Meta-Learning in Machine Learning - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/meta-learning-in-machine-learning/
102. Domain Generalization through Meta-Learning: A Survey - arXiv, accessed March 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2404.02785v3
103. Gradient-Regulated Meta-Prompt Learning for Generalizable Vision-Language Models - CVF Open Access, accessed March 13, 2025, https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/ICCV2023/papers/Li_Gradient-Regulated_Meta-Prompt_Learning_for_Generalizable_Vision-Language_Models_ICCV_2023_paper.pdf
104. What is Meta-Learning? Benefits, Applications and Challenges | dida blog, accessed March 13, 2025, https://dida.do/blog/what-is-meta-learning
105. Machines that self-adapt to new tasks without re-training - MIT CSAIL, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.csail.mit.edu/news/machines-self-adapt-new-tasks-without-re-training
106. Self-Supervised Learning | MongoDB, accessed March 13, 2025, https://www.mongodb.com/resources/basics/self-supervised-learning